Cloud-Based Connectivity Management Platform

A Connectivity Management Platform (CMP) is the software layer that controls every SIM in an IoT deployment from a single interface. It handles SIM provisioning, connectivity and roaming policies, lifecycle events such as activate, suspend and terminate, network diagnostics, and usage-based billing. Without a CMP, managing a fleet across multiple operators and countries means working through separate operator portals with no unified view. Enterprises and operators use a CMP to run thousands to millions of devices across multiple networks and territories without touching each SIM individually.

The Flolive CMP serves four audiences. MNOs use it to add IoT lines of business without building new infrastructure. MVNOs use it to launch connectivity services under their own brand. Enterprises use it to manage global device fleets across regions and operators from one console. IoT service providers and system integrators use it to resell connectivity in multi-tier models, with role-based access and usage segregation for each customer tier. The platform’s multi-tenant architecture means all four can operate on the same underlying network.

The Flolive CMP is a single-vendor, cloud-native platform that bundles the core network, BSS and connectivity management under one license, with no per-SIM or per-IMSI fees. It connects directly to a dedicated global core network rather than sitting on top of a third-party operator’s stack, which means real-time visibility and control instead of delayed batch reporting. Flolive puts the resulting saving at more than 70% on licensing compared with assembling equivalent capability from separate vendors.

Yes. The Flolive CMP ships white-label ready: operators and resellers apply their own logo, domain, rate plans, and customer hierarchy, so end customers see only their brand. This lets an operator launch IoT connectivity services without building platform infrastructure or exposing any Flolive-branded systems. White-labeling covers both the management console and the customer-facing portal, and it works alongside the multi-tier architecture, so each tenant sees only the accounts and usage that belong to it.

Most Flolive CMP deployments go live within four to six weeks. The modular cloud architecture means there is no hardware to procure and no core network to build, which removes the longest lead items from a traditional rollout. Timelines vary with scope: a white-label launch on existing Flolive coverage sits at the shorter end, while deployments needing custom BSS integrations, extra operator agreements, or migration of an existing SIM estate take longer. Flolive scopes each deployment before committing to a date.

Yes. The Flolive CMP supports both M2M eUICC and Consumer eUICC through integrated SM-DP and SM-SR subscription management systems, and it is SGP.32-ready for IoT remote SIM provisioning. Profiles can be downloaded, enabled, disabled, and switched over the air without anyone physically replacing a SIM. Devices already deployed in the field can therefore move between operator profiles as coverage, cost, or in-country regulatory requirements change, which matters most for assets with a long service life.

The Flolive CMP includes a real-time rating and billing engine. Usage is rated as it happens rather than in overnight batches, so spend and overage are visible before an invoice arrives. The engine supports prepaid, postpaid, pooled, and tiered pricing models, and billing is segregated per tenant, so resellers and enterprise accounts each see only their own usage and rates. Usage alerts and limits can be set per SIM or per pool to prevent unexpected charges.

Yes. Flolive offers the CMP as a fully managed service or as a platform you operate independently with full control. Under the managed model, Flolive handles platform operations, upgrades, and network-side troubleshooting while your team works in the console and APIs. Under the self-operated model, your team runs provisioning, policy, and billing configuration directly, with Flolive supporting the underlying core network and global coverage. Both models run on the same platform, so the choice is operational rather than architectural.